PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) provides guidelines for conducting and reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It incorporate advances in systematic review methodology and terminology.
Further reading
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Loannidis, J. P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J. & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. British Medical Journal, 339, Article b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
Covidence: Web-based review platform for screening and data extraction. Subscription required, but is free to Cochrane Review authors. A free trial is available for non-Cochrane Review authors which enables you to complete 1 full review, with up to 500 records. Covidence demo (video). Training materials:
Rayyan: Web-based review platform for screening and selecting studies (not full data extraction). Access options: free for three reviews or subscription charge for full access and all features. Training materials:
RevMan: a Cochrane Review Manager. Web-based platform, now requiring an individual subscription to use. Update your profile to student or early career professional for a discount. You can do a free RevMan trial to create a practice review to try out RevMan features.
Abstrackr overview: a free software for screening abstract and citations. Abstractr Login page.
JBI SUMARI: web-based tool for systematic reviews.
NVivo: analysing data and identifying patterns for qualitative researches. AUT PG students can request NVivo software via ICT Services. NVivo guide.
OpenMeta[Analyst]: Note: this download has a Trojan virus warning, the developers (Brown University) say this is a known issue, but please proceed with caution.
OpenMeta is an "open-source software for performing meta-analyses of binary, continuous, or diagnostic data, using a variety fixed and random-effects methods, including Bayesian and maximum likelihood analysis"
OpenMEE: free software for ecological and evolutionary meta-analysis
Systematic review data repository plus: a free tool for extraction and managing data
Vosviewer: use this tool for visualising bibliometric networks, clusters of studies, etc.
EndNote is useful in managing records for systematic reviews. You can:
Recommended steps when using a reference management software for your review
Step 1: Create a new EndNote library for your SR project.
Step 2: Refine your keywords and search selected databases.
Step 3: Create an inclusion group.
Step 4: Remove duplicates.
Step 5: Create Exclusion groups.
Create exclusion groups according to your exclusion criteria, for example, year, language, age, etc. These can be grouped under an Exclusion group set.
Example:
You will now be able to list the databases, number of records found for your search for each one, the number of duplicates, the number of excluded articles and the reason, and you will be left with an Inclusion/included folder or group of articles that you intend to evaluate for use in your review.
Additional guides:
Mendeley and Zotero can be used for systematic reviews in a similar way to EndNote as described above.
Group sets are not available but you can organise folders, groups or collections to follow the same process.